Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3614 14
Original file (NR3614 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY

BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS
701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

   

 

   

 

 

 

 

     

 

  
  

  

  
 

        
   

   

ay
THIS 18 im Yel to your n Lor ec n of
= Oo you } £oe2 rec I f Ou
naval record to the Swe + P
ile © i & uf Ak i oak JET ec
Ze
5
panel
+ io
+ ¢
punishment and 1 convictec I ]
a L1Q. ¥ Jil le wh iL
ceeltity , i3 : .
lawful order nd v if
Subsequentl }
aivachar _
discnarge i) lischarade
discha
reason ict due to commis c offense.
\ procedural 2 your right t
hAnard ri ‘

       

wa U4
The Board, in its review of your entire record and application,
carefully weighed all potentially mitigating factors, such as
your post service conduct and desire to upgrade your discharge.
Nevertheless, the Board found that these factors were not
sufficient to warrant recharacterization of your discharge given
the seriousness of your misconduct. The Board noted that you
waived your right to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention
or a better characterization of service. Accordingly, your
application has been denied.

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorable action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the
Board reconsider its decision upon submission of new and material
evidence within one year from the date of the Board’s decision.
New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board
prior to making its decision in your case. In this regard, it is
important to keep in mind that a presumption of regularity
attaches to all official records. Consequently, when applying
for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on
the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material
error or injustice.

Sincerely,

ROBERT J. O'NEILL
Executive Director

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2009 | 10558-09

    Original file (10558-09.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 9 September ove administrative separation action was initiated by reason 0 am 7 a eine ; 74° a Vado 4 os misconduct for drug abuse You waived your rights to consult iL SCor#n C £ rug DUSe . The Board noted that you waived your rights to an ADB, your best opportunity for retention or a more favorable characterization of service. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2001 | 01683-01

    Original file (01683-01.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    P/ OF THE NAVY OF DC NAV4L OPERATION 203!iO-2000 S IN REPLY REFER TO 1301 SER N13/OlK094 25 April 2001 Head, Officer Personnel Plans and Policy Branch (N131) Board for Correction of Naval Records Coordinator (PERS-OOZCB) (1) Title 10, U. S. Code, Sectilln 653 - Minimum service requirement for certain flight crew positions. designation as a Naval Aviator as assigned an eight-year (ADSO) in accordance with Title ed to serve on designation as a Following his (l), Per Enclosure minimum service...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03055-08

    Original file (03055-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your ' application on 23 April 2008. your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Regulations authorize the assignment of an RE-4 reenlistment code to individuals who are separated due to a diagnosed personality disorder. Consequently, when applying for a correction of...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2005 | 06734-05

    Original file (06734-05.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    After review, the discharge authority directed the type of discharge warranted by your service record.Character of service is based, in part, on conduct and overall trait averages, which are computed from marks assigned during periodic evaluations. (Also, Service Number if applicable) ICORRECTED TO READ SEPARATION DATE ON DD FORM 214 BEING CORRECTED - 10 MAY 73 Ilc. NONE****** ********************************* ** ***** ************** ************ This DD form 215 cancels and supersedes DD...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4429 14

    Original file (NR4429 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documente the Board consisled of your appl ication, togethe1 material submitted in support thereol, your Neva applicable statutes, regulations, and policies and conse careful the to establish After record, found the evidence Board the existence yf probable injustice You enlisted in the Navy and began a period of act 25 September 2006. The NDPRB denied your request to upgrade the characterization of your discharge due to the seriousness of your misconduct. Consequently, when applying for a...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2006 | 07979-06

    Original file (07979-06.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies.After careful an conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Boar found the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or injustice.On 14 September 972 you enlisted in the Marine Corps at age 20. Nevertheless, the Board concluded that...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6844 14_Redacted

    Original file (NR6844 14_Redacted.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF NAVAL RECORDS 701 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1001 ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 This is in reference to your application for correction of your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 USC 155 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 2 March 2015. Your allegations of error and injustice were reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR4903 13

    Original file (NR4903 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all Material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. On 13 July 1993 the discharge authority approved: this’ recommendation and directed separation under other than honorable conditions by reason of misconduct, and on 16 July 1993 you were so discharged. Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2008 | 03639-08

    Original file (03639-08.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 31 March 2009. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record, and applicable statutes, regulations, and policies. Your request for discharge was granted and on 14 November 1979, you received an other than honorable discharge for the good of the scrvice in lieu...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR6441 14

    Original file (NR6441 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Your application claims, “I was eligible to transfer to the Flee. Reserve Pemruary oe 2011. iL was stationed at the Navy Personnel Command (NPC) at the time the Post 9/11 GI (Bjiii was enacted and consulted several individuals prior to electing to transfer to the Fleet Reserve.” Petitioner further claims that “one of those individuals was a person responsible for the approval to transfer eligibility for all Navy members at NPC. This letter states that I had an active duty date obligation...